🔗 Share this article

Europe experienced widespread relief on Monday, as the crisis triggered by the announcement of a new comprehensive peace framework for achieving ceasefire appeared – temporarily – to have been defused. A American diplomat spoke of "significant advancement" after diplomatic discussions in Geneva. On Monday night, the Kremlin made its countermove: an extensive attack of rocket attacks on Kyiv.

The Cycle of Diplomacy and Destruction

The sequence of opposing developments captured the bleak nature of the outgoing year. By day, negotiation efforts are waged: optimistic declarations are issued from various governments. Immense energy is expended on restraining particular approaches. By night, Russian leadership clearly shows the world that, for them, conflict continues to be the main instrument for achieving "settlement".

Nighttime Reality

As military strikes unfolded into the early hours of Tuesday, the present situation of Ukraine's vulnerability was laid bare. Ukraine is equipped to monitor projectile deployments from Russian territory, a capacity enabled by up-to-date information. From observation points, defense planes that had been scrambled to intercept incoming guided weapons flew past – advanced fighter aircraft delivered to Ukraine by NATO members.

Moments later, Kyiv's anti-aircraft weapons activated: multiple launches targeted at a incoming threat. This was a modern interception technology at work, most likely supplied through Western nations. Every firing jolts you unexpectedly, rattling buildings. The moment of terror quickly becomes sober acceptance: possibly the hostile projectile won't cause damage this time, sparing the city from ruin and further power outages.

Persistent Threats

Following this, a large-caliber weapon opened up on a drone in the vicinity, part of a defensive team – most likely Western-made equipment. Sadly, the bullets missed the hostile drone – it continued its flight toward its target.

Periodically, this persisted until dawn. Kyiv faced the daybreak reports: several casualties, destruction and heating outages in multiple buildings as a result of the night's assault. As always, everyone still continued their routines – experiencing conflict. But those full day illustrated Ukraine's essential dependence on Western support – a reliance that neighboring countries are demonstrably unable to substitute in the near term.

Failed Diplomacy

The 28-point plan from US administration provoked deep reactions, debate and serious worry – and temporarily diverted attention from Ukraine's largest corruption scandal in years. Yet, we have witnessed similar scenarios, after previous diplomatic encounters and multilateral gatherings.

Every new approach from Washington unfolds according to the identical sequence: a diplomatic cavalry charge against Ukraine, which Kyiv, with allied governments, effectively counters. They stabilise the situation but never actually secure success. This pattern will, no doubt, persist.

Tactical Assessments

It is convenient to criticize certain parties of persistently promoting Russian terms. But that does not seem to be the whole story. US administration works based on a principle familiar among seasoned negotiators: you cannot win at the negotiating table what you have been unable to protect through force. The White House presumes that it is unfeasible to force Russia to abandon the areas that it already controls in Ukraine's southern or eastern regions.

The challenge is that while recognising this factual reality, American administration does minimal to deter Moscow, through statements or actions, from believing that the situation will not shift further in its favour in the months ahead.

Conflicting Perspectives

Therefore, Moscow is confident that the clock favors them – that Ukraine and its supporters are nearing depletion. Their incentive to agree to terms that does not give them the greatest potential benefit is virtually nonexistent. There may be multiple initiatives to achieve ceasefire, but they will carry on as long as Russia's leadership remains completely certain in the conclusion.

On the contrary, Ukrainian leadership believes that Ukraine can still persist, progressively conceding people and territory but preventing a total frontline collapse until circumstances change in its benefit.

Current Realities

Realistically, there are no genuine requirements for a truce. Now, personal considerations are entering the equation: personal goals to negotiate peace and obtain worldwide acknowledgment, and Kyiv's twin challenges – on one hand, not to estrange crucial supporters, and on the other, to unite the population around the country's interests against any initiative Kyiv finds unworkable, so that their attention does not shift toward homefront challenges. And although their task will now be significantly challenging after current events, it remains quite doubtful that this will change their overall approach.

These two forces are driving the talks.

Summary and Prospects

It took a only one week to terminate the 28 points of the current initiative. Aggressive and erratic handling of the matter by Washington, opposition by Ukraine and the other European countries, along with calming attempts of diplomats, and finally, recent disclosures, all achieved their purpose.

While new proposals based on established approaches are forthcoming, Kyiv, London and other Western governments should draw one fundamental conclusion: Ukraine and Europe will only be able to resist negotiation assaults from Washington that are founded on Moscow's terms and demonstrate certain reluctance to modify developments, if they maintain solidarity and enhance their military capacity at a significantly accelerated rate. If they do, neither external pressure nor military threats will be able to break them. In the meantime, Ukraine's capacity to repel nightly air assaults will, for the predictable period, primarily depend on continued Western support.