🔗 Share this article

The ninth circuit court has upheld a ban on sending state troops in Portland, Oregon, following a recent legal decision.

Appeals Court Agrees to Rehear Legal Matter

The federal appeals court decided on Tuesday that it would reexamine the legal dispute concerning the executive power with an expanded panel of 11 judges. The court also overturned a earlier ruling from a three-judge panel that had supported the administration.

Ongoing Dispute Over Troop Deployment

This order represents the most recent turn in a long-running legal battle over whether the former president has the legal right and justification to send state military units in Portland. Approximately 200 federalized guard members have been in uncertainty since late September when the deployment effort was started in response to ongoing demonstrations.

Conflicting Arguments

The administration has argued that federal officials at the ICE facility in the southern part of the city were facing threats, while city and state officials assert that municipal police have control of the circumstances.

Contrary to characterizations of the city as “war ravaged”, residents have been posting videos of lush hiking trails and a vibrant culinary culture, and planning activities such as an Emergency Naked Bike Ride against the “militarization of our city”.

Recent Legal Actions

The Tuesday ruling came after a US district judge in Portland enacted two legal injunctions this month – one blocking the federalization of the Oregon national guard, and another prohibiting the deployment of any military personnel in the state, after attempts to circumvent the first order by mobilizing troops from California.

On the previous day, the appeals court had temporarily suspended the initial decision – allowing control of 200 Oregon national guard – but the subsequent injunction stayed effective, blocking the physical sending of the forces.

Full Panel Consideration

The Tuesday decision means the matter will be heard “en banc” – with both rulings under review simultaneously – by a group of eleven justices.

“This ruling demonstrates that facts are important and that the courts are working to hold this administration accountable. The constitution limits the president’s power, and Oregon’s communities cannot be treated as a training ground for expansive government power,” stated the state attorney general in a official comment.

“The judicial body is sending a definite signal: the president cannot send the armed forces into American urban areas without cause. We will continue protecting Oregon’s laws, values, and autonomy as this legal proceeding moves forward and our fight continues in the courts.”